Diario de -Diablo, 20 ago. 19

When it comes to figuring out what to eat for weight loss, the most important factor is eating less. When you consume less calories than you spend you will lose weight and the diet that helps you lose weight best will be the one that allows you to consume less calories without causing much distress or lethargy. The key is to pick a diet that you can adhere to.

Your bodyweight depends on your total caloric intake more than on your macronutrient ratios (how many of your calories come from carbohydrates, proteins, fats, and alcohol). Increased caloric intake as an independent variable is more than sufficient to explain the current obesity epidemic, [1] without the need to find a scapegoat, such as high-fructose corn syrup.[2]

A trial in a controlled setting (a metabolic ward) compared several isocaloric diets composed of 15% protein, 15-85% carbohydrate, and 0-70% fat. It concluded that caloric restriction, not macronutrient ratios, determined weight loss. [3] Comparing low- and high-carbohydrate diets over 6 weeks [4] and 12 weeks [5] led to the same conclusion, as did comparing a low-fat/high-protein diet with a high-fat/standard-protein diet. [6]

Another trial in a metabolic ward noted that, in healthy individuals overeating for 8 weeks, caloric intake alone accounted for the increase in body fat. However, caloric expenditure, total weight, and lean mass increased with protein as a percentage of caloric intake. [7] In contrast, a previous study on the impact of protein on weight loss had noted that women lost as much weight on a high-protein diet as on a high-carb diet, but that subjects with high triglycerides lost more fat on the high-protein diet. [8]

In people suffering from hyperinsulinemia, [9] [10] [11] insulin resistance, [12] or type-2 diabetes, [13] [14] [15] [16] the results are mostly the same: Caloric restriction, not macronutrient ratios, leads to weight loss. Two studies noted, however, that lean mass was better preserved in women (but not men) on a high-protein diet, [10] [16] and one study did find a greater weight loss (nearly entirely from fat) in the high-protein group (men and women). [11]

In conclusion, losing weight requires a negative energy balance, which can be obtained by eating less, as we have seen, but also by exercising more.

More interesting info at the link.

https://examine.com/nutrition/what-should-you-eat-for-weight-loss/

Ver Calendario de Dieta, 20 agosto 2019:
3018 kcal Grasa: 89,65g | Prot: 181,73g | Carbh: 449,55g.   Desayuno: mint chip smart pint, Bananas , Quest White Chocolate Raspberry Protein Bar, Trader Joe's Bread & Butter Pickles, Carl Buddig Corned Beef, Ole Extreme Wellness High Fiber Low Carb Tortillas, Quest White Chocolate Raspberry Protein Bar, 1% Fat Milk, Kellogg's Special K Protein Original Multi-Grain Touch of Cinnamon, Chobani Strawberry Blended Greek Yogurt. Almuerzo: Quest Chocolate Peanut Butter Protein Bar, Winchell's Old Fashioned Donut - Chocolate Iced, Lean or Extra Lean Ground Beef or Patty, Pringles Original Potato Crisps. Cena: Pears , Peach, Chobani vanilla greek yogurt. Pasa Bocas / Otros: Sugared or Glazed Doughnuts , Peach. más...
3349 kcal Ejercicio: Durmiendo - 7 horas y 40 minutos, Sentado - 8 horas, Entrenamiento con Pesas (Moderado) - 1 hora y 20 minutos, Montar en Bicicleta (Lento) - <16/kph - 1 hora y 35 minutos, Descansando - 5 horas y 25 minutos. más...

30 Seguidores    Apoyo   

Comentarios 
Thanks, Diablo! You’re such a good teacher! 😊👍🏻 
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: laraae
And, just to expand on this info - it's also not necessary to create a steep deficit in order to lose. 250-500 cals less of one's total approximate TDEE is sufficient if not optimal and a .5-1 lb loss per week on average is normal and healthy. It is not necessary to live off of 1200 cals or less in order to lose weight unless one is sedentary and shorter than 5 ft. At 5'2 - I rarely if ever went under 1400 cals for a deficit. 
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: Egull1
Thanks for sharing! 
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: moopie123
Great advice, Egull. And thanks Laraee and Moopie! 
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: -Diablo
For every "study" there's a "study" that states the opposite. Bottom line - find what works for YOU! Not the infomercial...  
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: stana2z
Being able to stick to your plan is huge!! If you cannot follow it for life you will just gain it back. It has to fit your life, your family and the way you cook to be sustainable. Good info Diablo. Egull1 I will add to that 1200 calories, sometimes meds make a difference. I'm on steroids for asthma daily, not sedentary but if I go over 1400 calories averaging over a week I gain. Lots of factors in one's life can have an affect.  
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: wholefoodnut
Stana2z please link me a metabolic ward study that proves another method besides good ole CICO is actually better. Those are the ones you want to look for. 
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: -Diablo
I highly doubt there's any study that will show non trivial weight loss occurring with a caloric surplus. Overall I've lost about 80 pounds doing keto, and more recently along with intermittent fasting. These were great ways for me to do a long term calorie deficit. Pretty sure I could've picked other ways but wouldn't have liked it as much and may have failed. Having a plan, getting after it relentlessly and sticking to it is the quickest path to success. The plan has to have you at a deficit or it won't work. Find the easiest method that supports the things and reap the rewards. That's been my experience.  
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: juraitwaluzka
👍juraitwaluzla  
20 ago. 19 por el miembro: moopie123
First time given my take on metabolic ward studies - I have only read 2 about carb-insulin resistance, one was the follow up of the other. Neither prove nor disprove CICO. And looking at the study design - the low fat diet was significantly lowered but not to the extent the low carb diet was lowered to mimic someone in ketosis. Does it mean the conclusions are incorrect? Not at all - just another study maybe needed before professional consensus.  
22 ago. 19 por el miembro: AboutMyTribe
sorry - I need to reword my sentence... the low carb diet was not significantly lowered as much as the low fat diet was to mimic someone in ketosis.  
22 ago. 19 por el miembro: AboutMyTribe

     
 

Enviar un Comentario


Debes iniciar sesión para enviar un comentario. Has clic Aquí para iniciar sesión
 


Peso Histórico de -Diablo


Consigue la aplicación
    
© 2024 FatSecret. Todos los derechos reservados.